1. In Section II, Benjamin states that "Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be." Is this a valid argument? Doesn't a reproduction of a work of art become unique in existence at its own time and place? Does the reproduction of something become something new that can be considered unique in this regard?
2. In section IV, Benjamin says "The instant the criterion of authenticity ceases to be applicable to artistic production, the total function of art is reversed. Instead of being based on ritual, it begins to be based on another practice – politics." Benjamin is painting contemporary art, especially reproduction, as a removal of authenticity in art here. How does authenticity get taken away from this method? Is something really inauthentic when it's a reproduction? In what ways can this argument be countered; how can, for example, a digital reproduction actually become authentic?
No comments:
Post a Comment